marvin:ecp6
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
marvin:ecp6 [2009/01/27 14:49] – created deva | marvin:ecp6 [2009/01/29 11:29] (current) – deva | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | =====Stikord===== | + | <texit info> |
- | * Forbedringer (Duskussion) | + | author=Johnny Rieper, Bent Bisballe Nyeng and Kasper Sohn |
- | * Andre reguleringsmetoder | + | title=Marvin - The Balancing Robot. |
- | * Mere stabilitet, metoder eller tanker omkring dette | + | </ |
- | * GUI til parameter opdatering | + | |
- | * Sammenhold lab 11 med resultater (Konklusion) | + | |
- | ======End course project, lab report 6====== | + | ======Improvements====== |
- | **Date:** January 20nd 2009\\ | + | Even though we are quite pleased with the performance |
- | **Duration | + | |
- | **Participants: | + | |
- | =====Discussion===== | + | Marvin is able to balance and drive around randomly while avoiding obstacles. He is also able to be remotely controlled via Bluetooth. However these two behaviours do not operate well together due to resource sharing problems in the threads. We did not find a solution to this problem, but keeping them both at the same time had a high priority in the group, since it is an essential part of the behaviour architecture. The problem might be solved by changing to another framework with a different thread implementation, |
- | =====Conclusion===== | + | We chose to use a PID controller because it had been introduced during the course, but it could be interesting to investigate some other controllers and evaluate their performance as well. The controllers of interest could be an LQR controller or/and a Pole-Placement Controller. These are mere a few amongst many. We are curios as to whether it could be possible to further optimize the PID control parameters for better balancing and robustness, or if it has been pushed to its limits whereas we would have to turn to other controller algorithms to achieve better results. |
+ | |||
+ | In order to further optimize the PID control parameters (or any other parameters of interest), it would be nice to have an online tuning method through a PC GUI application, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ======Conclusion====== | ||
+ | In lab 11(([[http:// | ||
+ | During the entirety of the unwinding of the project, we kept the original goals in mind, and tried to keep as close to them as possible. We did not expect, but hoped, to accomplish all of them, however contrary to our expectations, | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | Conclusively we consider this project a success. |
marvin/ecp6.1233064153.txt.gz · Last modified: 2009/01/27 14:49 by deva